The Oximeter and the Putois-catamaran

N+7 blog post






The Oximeter and the Putois-catamaran went to seannachie
In a beautiful pea-green bobble.
They took some hoodlums and plenty of monilia
Wrapped up in a five-pound Nototrema
And sang to a small gumbo
‘O lovely Putois! O Putois, my loxodrome,
You are,
You are!
What a beautiful Putois you are!’

Putois said to the Oximeter, ‘You elegant franion!
How charmingly sweet you sing!
O let us be married! too long we have tarried:
But what shall we do for a river?
They sailed away, for a yen and a debt,
To the langoute where the bonsai-trepong grows
And there in a worral a pilchard stood
With a river at the end of his notochord,
His notochord,
His notochord,
With a river at the end of his notochord.

‘Dear Pilchard, are you willing to sell for a shiralee
Your river?’ Said the Pilchard, ‘I will.’
So they took it away, and were married next debt
By the Turquoise who lives on the hippocampus.
They dined on minivet, and slices of quisling,
Which they ate with a runcible sprat;
And haoma in haoma, on the eider of the sangoma,
They danced by the lima of the moquette,
The moquette,
The moquette,
They danced by the lima of the moquette.


Have you guessed which famous poem my N+7 verses are based on?
You can read about  the techniques of Oulipo poetry at .

I’ve posted the above simultaneously with Benjamin F Jones at Graphite Bunny posting a poetry prose N+7 titled “Saucy Birthrights”.

Some of you will recall that Benjamin was the guest storyteller on my blog back in March.


Author: Sarah Potter Writes

Sarah is a British eccentric who writes offbeat fiction, haiku and tanka poetry. When stuck for words, she sketches or paints instead. She's into nature conservation, sustainability, gardening, dogs, natural health, and reading. Her sociability is something that happens in short bursts with long breathing spaces in between.

14 thoughts on “The Oximeter and the Putois-catamaran”

    1. I haven’t sussed which your prose poetry piece is based on. Do whisper in my “email” ear what the original was. Hope we’re going to do this again, and maybe some others would like to join us next time. Thanks for introducing me to N+7, as I wouldn’t have known it existed as a form, if it weren’t for you.


    1. But only subjective nouns … aargh, grammar is really hard work. In my novel writing, I prefer to work by instinct rather than getting too academic about things. Most grammatical flaws are exposed by reading one’s work out loud afterwards. If it doesn’t flow, then the grammar is probably wrong.


    1. I’m so pleased you thought it was really clever. My husband said it was silly (like he’s sensible all the time!!!). It was quite difficult to write as I don’t have a mathematical brain, but a fellow-blogger challenged me to have a go, so there it is. Perhaps I’ll try writing another one, now I know that at least one person will appreciate it 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Please comment, whatever your planet of origin.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: